Today, I had a very
hard discussion on community-based facilitation. The person, who was
challenging me, told me that community-based facilitation is not possible by
the time there is a strong centralized system. Without a democratic political
system, you cannot talk about facilitation. A decentralized system is needed;
democratic institutions are needed; an active civil society is a must; and then
you need people with a culture of group activities, active listening and
cooperation. When such things do not exist, you cannot even talk about “facilitation”.
Since the system will stop you, the institutions and civil society are not
there to support you, and people are not cooperative. Without all these, how
you can facilitate a group at local level.
That was a very hard
question; in response, I raised so many arguments. Here, I refer to one of them
and I will try to add my other points in the coming posts. People in Iran have
had a strong culture of cooperation and participation. It cannot be denied; during
the history, you can easily find many traditional models of participation in
villages and even in towns. For instance “Varehgari” is a form of traditional participation.
Goats were milked altogether (during milking season) and given to one person or
one family (whose turn was to be given the milk). In this way, the person or
the family could have enough milk to use or to make cheese or yoghurt. There
were certain rules and regulations to manage the process. Also, it has had other
functions too; a research paper published in “Ensanshenasi Journal”
(Anthropology, vol. 2, No. 4, pages 243-255) in 2003 shows that such tradition
has been like a “cooperative” for economizing the process of livestock
livelihood. The author claims that this tradition is still being used in
certain villages.
There are other forms
of cooperation at rural level and some of them are still on-going. When I was
working in Freydounkenar, Damgahdari was another form of cooperation and local
participation. In Damgahdari, rice cultivators come together to create a secure
place for migrant birds to hunt a percentage of the coming birds in Fall and
Winter; of course, our project was to work with damgah owners to decrease their
hunting and to see if they can use such a cooperation for bird-watching rather
than hunting them. In Ezbaran, and
Sorkhroud (in Freydounkenar – near Babolsar), it is more than 300 years that
they are doing that. Without a group activity, it is not possible to create
such a damgah.
Also, other traditions
in villages such as marriage or even mourning were done (and are being carried
out) with cooperation, which I think, it needs more research. Parts of this
culture still exist in towns too. In fact, I said that "participation" is not a "dream". It was a part of our culture (which was somehow weakened by modernization policies) and still it is there...
You can write also about "Kayer" a tradition in the north of Iran for harvesting the rice. In this tradition, local people helped each other to harvest the rice without any payment. Even family members were involved in this time of the harvest. All neighbors could harvest their farm one by one and in collaboration to each other. Thanks to Ms Maryam Attarieh for reminding me this point.
ReplyDeleteThank you Parvin for the comment. I wait until I receive more comments and then I will try to have a more complete list of participatory traditions in rural areas in Iran.
ReplyDelete